Remember when “Shadow IT” first blindsided security teams? Employees were secretly using Dropbox, Slack, and Google Docs long before IT gave them the green light. What looked like small productivity hacks turned into massive SaaS sprawl, compliance headaches, and data leakage risks.
Fast forward to today, and we’re watching the sequel—only this time, the stakes are much higher. Meet Shadow AI: the unsanctioned, unmonitored, and unstoppable wave of generative AI tools sneaking into your business.
Your employees aren’t just adopting brand-new AI apps under the radar, they’re also unlocking hidden AI capabilities inside the SaaS tools you already approved. Microsoft Copilot in M365, Slack GPT in messaging, and Gemini inside Google Workspace can all quietly expand how data flows, often without IT even realizing it. At the same time, standalone tools like ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity are being used as everyday assistants outside official guardrails. Together, this mix of sanctioned and unsanctioned AI creates a brand-new category of AI security risk.
What Is Shadow AI (Really)?
If “Shadow IT” was the practice of employees using unapproved apps, Shadow AI is when they do the same thing with generative AI tools.
That includes:
- An employee asking ChatGPT to rewrite sensitive customer emails
- A product manager using Perplexity to analyze competitor strategy documents
- A developer running source code snippets through Claude for debugging help
- A marketing team feeding campaign plans into Gemini to generate creative angles
In each case, corporate data is leaving the enterprise perimeter and entering an AI system IT didn’t authorize—and may never fully understand.
This isn’t a hypothetical. Employees across every function are already experimenting with GenAI tools to get their work done faster. Meanwhile, many executives are still in “wait and see” mode. That disconnect means Shadow AI is already part of your enterprise reality, whether leadership realizes it or not.
And not all AI tools are created equal. Well-known platforms like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity at least come from established vendors, but entrants such as DeepSeek raise far more troubling questions. DeepSeek has surged in popularity while facing regulatory pushback across the US and Europe for how it handles user data, with several governments already moving to block or restrict access. This concern isn’t theoretical—enterprise data fed into such platforms could be stored abroad, governed by foreign jurisdictions, and left outside the protections of frameworks like GDPR. These lesser-vetted AI tools may be fast to adopt but offer little clarity around how data is stored, secured, or used for model training, making them particularly risky inside an enterprise environment.
Why Shadow AI (or Rogue AI) Is More Dangerous Than Shadow IT
Shadow IT created visibility and compliance problems. Shadow AI, or what some now call rogue AI, does all of that and more. Rogue AI is simply another way of describing employees’ use of unsanctioned, unmanaged AI tools. It sounds futuristic, but it’s really just today’s Shadow AI in action: employees moving faster than security guardrails and putting sensitive data at risk:
- Permanent Data Exposure
Unlike SaaS apps where data can (theoretically) be deleted, once information is fed into a GenAI model, it may persist indefinitely. A substantial amount of data employees paste into AI tools is sensitive—source code, financial data, PII—and it’s gone the moment it leaves your environment. - Opaque Integrations
AI assistants are increasingly embedded in tools you already use—Slack, M365, Notion, etc. These AI layers quietly expand data access without IT oversight. You think you’re managing SaaS, but you’re actually managing SaaS + AI copilots. - Compliance Landmines
Regulatory frameworks weren’t built for AI. Feeding PII into Claude or contracts into Gemini can create GDPR, HIPAA, or PCI violations overnight. Insurance claims may even be denied if data loss occurred via unsanctioned AI.
Vendor Trust Gap
With SaaS, you could vet vendors. With GenAI, you’re often sending data to opaque black-box systems with unknown retention and training policies. “Rogue AI” isn’t Skynet—it’s your sensitive data training someone else’s model.
The Shadow AI Adoption Curve
Here’s the hard truth: your people aren’t using AI because they want to break rules—they’re using it because it makes them faster, smarter, and more creative.
- Developers don’t want to wait on internal code reviews
- Sales reps want instant pitch decks
- Analysts want immediate insights instead of waiting for BI queries
When the official line from IT is “not yet,” employees turn to unsanctioned AI tools. It’s history repeating itself: productivity first, policy second.
This means bans don’t work. Blocking AI access often just pushes employees to use personal accounts—making Shadow AI even harder to detect and riskier to manage.
Shadow AI in SaaS Security: The Blind Spot
Here’s where things get tricky. Most organizations are already investing in SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) to monitor SaaS sprawl. But Shadow AI isn’t showing up on the radar.
Why?
- AI is often embedded inside sanctioned SaaS apps (Microsoft Copilot, Slack GPT, etc.)
- Employees use personal accounts to access AI tools, bypassing enterprise logging
- AI usage looks like “normal traffic” in network monitoring, making it invisible to traditional controls
In other words: Shadow AI is SaaS security on hard mode for an unequipped security team.
The Risks in Plain English
Let’s cut through the frameworks and checklists. Here’s what Shadow AI risk really looks like inside a business:
- Data Leakage: Your engineer pastes proprietary code into Claude, so it’s now out of your hands—forever
- Compliance Breach: Your HR team feeds employee records into Gemini to draft policy docs. Congratulations, you may have just triggered a privacy violation
- Reputational Risk: Your marketing team uploads embargoed product launch details into Perplexity. If that leaks? It’s front-page news
- Operational Blindness: You literally don’t know which AI tools are in play, what data they’re touching, or where that data goes
Spotlight on AI Security: Tool by Tool
ChatGPT Security
ChatGPT is often the first GenAI tool employees adopt, which makes it a major Shadow AI entry point. The main risks come from employees pasting in sensitive data—contracts, code, or customer records—that then leave your control.
How to secure it: Build clear guardrails on what data can be shared, monitor SaaS-to-SaaS connections if ChatGPT is tied to systems like SharePoint or Slack, and offer employees safer “approved” AI channels so they don’t default to unsanctioned use.
Claude Security
Claude’s strength is its ability to handle very long documents and context, which means employees may drop entire strategy decks or meeting transcripts into it. That creates risks around intellectual property and sensitive business insights leaving the enterprise.
How to secure it: Implement usage policies that specifically address document uploads, monitor for connections between Claude and SaaS platforms like Google Drive or Notion, and classify the types of content employees can safely run through the tool.
Perplexity Security
Perplexity’s hybrid of AI and live search is powerful, but it can blend your data with external results in ways that create unpredictable exposure. Sharing research data, financial analysis, or product plans could put sensitive info in play with external sources.
How to secure it: Treat Perplexity like a SaaS integration—track who is using it, apply data classification policies, and provide employees with clear rules of engagement on what’s acceptable to share.
Gemini Security
Gemini is embedded in Google Workspace, which means employees may use it without realizing it—drafting emails in Gmail, generating content in Docs, or analyzing Sheets. That invisibility makes it easy for data to flow into AI with no oversight.
How to secure it: Extend SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) to cover AI-native features in Workspace. Audit where Gemini is enabled, enforce role-based access, and create policies for what kinds of data are allowed in Workspace AI prompts.
AI Security Isn’t About Stopping AI
This is where a lot of organizations get it wrong. AI isn’t going away, and no one wants to work in a company that bans the tools everyone else is using.
The future of AI security is not about prohibition—it’s about visibility, control, and enablement.
A modern AI security strategy should include:
- Discovery: You can’t protect what you can’t see. Map which GenAI apps employees are actually using
- Classification: Not all data is equal. Customer PII ≠ marketing copy. Tag and prioritize risks
- Approved App Lists: Define which AI tools are sanctioned for use and make that list visible to employees, reducing the temptation to experiment with unvetted platforms
- Guardrails, Not Walls: Set usage boundaries (e.g., “no customer data in ChatGPT”) with real enforcement, not just policy docs
- Cultural Alignment: Train employees to be partners in AI security. The message isn’t “don’t use AI,” it’s “use it safely”
AI Security in Practice: What Security Leaders Should Do Now
Here’s a playbook that balances security with productivity:
- Acknowledge the reality: The majority of your org is already using AI—whether sanctioned or not
- Extend SaaS security to cover AI: Treat AI tools as SaaS apps with higher risk profiles
- Expand visibility: Monitoring must cover AI copilots embedded in apps like Microsoft 365, Slack, and Salesforce
- Red-team your AI exposure: Assume employees are pasting sensitive data into ChatGPT today—what’s the blast radius if that data leaks?
- Shift from blocking to enabling: Provide approved AI pathways so employees don’t default to Shadow AI
The Future: Shadow AI Is Just Getting Started
By next year, every SaaS tool you use will have an AI layer. Salesforce has Einstein. Microsoft has Copilot. Google Workspace has Gemini. The line between “AI app” and “SaaS app” is already blurring.
This means AI security is SaaS security. There’s no separating them anymore.
The companies that thrive won’t be the ones that try to block AI. They’ll be the ones that embrace AI safely—giving employees the tools they want while ensuring data, compliance, and risk management stay intact.
Closing Thought
Shadow AI isn’t an abstract, future concern. It’s already here. It’s in your enterprise today, handling your data, and operating outside your security team’s visibility.
The big question is no longer: “Will our employees use AI?”
It’s: “Will our security strategy evolve fast enough to keep up?”
If Shadow IT was yesterday’s SaaS headache, Shadow AI is today’s security migraine. But unlike Shadow IT, this time you have the chance to get ahead—before your data, compliance, and reputation become the cost of ignoring the risks.
Want to see how much AI is already in play across your organization—and how to rein in the risks? Book a personalized demo or request your free risk assessment today.
.jpg)
